Market Snapshot of Shipping Corporation of India |
A. Company Performance
Profitability
Analysis:
(Rs. Crore/ Rs. 10 million)
|
SCI
(Year ending 31st March 2016)
|
Great Eastern
(Year
ending 31st March 2016)
|
Net
Sales
|
4,247.98
|
3,804.47
|
All
expenses other than finance cost, depreciation
|
3,151.32
|
1969.71
|
EBDITA
(Operating Profits)
|
1,096.66
|
1834.76
|
EBDITA (Operating Profits) %
|
26.03%
|
48.23%
|
Depreciation
|
610.72
|
674.63
|
EBITA
|
485.94
|
1160.13
|
EBITA %
|
11.53%
|
30.49%
|
Interest
|
210.89
|
284.64
|
Interest
Cost to Sales - %
|
4.96%
|
7.48%
|
EBT
|
275.05
|
875.49
|
EBT %
|
6.53%
|
23.01%
|
Net
Non-Operating Income
|
160.89
|
274.04
|
FINAL
PBT
|
435.94
|
1149.53
|
FINAL PBT %
|
10.35%
|
30.22%
|
Income
Tax
|
46.54
|
110.13
|
PAT
|
389.40
|
1039.40
|
PAT %
|
9.24%
|
27.32
|
Highlights:
1. It is quite obvious that even though the
revenues of both the companies are more or less same, the expenses of SCI are
160% higher compared to Great Eastern. The reasons in our opinion are:
a. SCI being a public sector company has
limitations in reducing its expenses;
b. The operations of SCI are almost in every
area of shipping, including passenger travel, whereas the latter is only in
selected areas. However a more diversified operation though may not be highly
profitable brings in stability and safety comforts.
2. SCI’s interest costs as a percentage of
revenues is significantly lower compared to Great Eastern (4.96% as against
7.48%). Further, SCI is consistently bringing down borrowings by abstaining
from paying dividends and going forward we believe interest costs of SCI will
come down even more.
Conclusion:
Though Great
Eastern’s operations are significantly more efficient than those of SCI, the
latter’s margins are decent in the challenging market conditions and operating
expenses are declining steadily since FY 2011-12 (see graph in annexure).
Balance Sheet Analysis
(Rs. Crore/ Rs. 10 million)
|
SCI
(Year ending 31st March 2016)
|
Great Eastern
(Year
ending 31st March 2016)
|
Short term borrowings
|
0
|
0
|
Other current liabilities
|
3,194.23
|
2,379.83
|
Total current Liabilities
|
3,194.23
|
2,379.83
|
Long term Borrowings
|
5,248.32
|
4,930.21
|
Total term liabilities
|
5,392.92
|
4,967.82
|
Total outside liabilities (TOL)
|
8,587.15
|
7,347.65
|
Net Worth
|
6,908.36
|
8,283.90
|
Total Liabilities
|
15,495.51
|
15,631.55
|
Current Assets
|
2,496.62
|
4,141.85
|
Total Fixed Assets (Net Block) + Capital Work In
Progress
|
12,611.11
|
11,017.69
|
Investments and other non current assets
|
387.20
|
471.38
|
Total Intangible Assets including those under
development
|
0.58
|
0.63
|
Total Assets
|
15,495.51
|
15,631.55
|
(Rs. Crore/ Rs. 10 million)
|
Desirable/ Recommended
|
SCI
(Year ending 31st March 2016)
|
Great Eastern
(Year
ending 31st March 2016)
|
Tangible Net Worth (Net Worth –
Intangible Assets)
|
|
6,907.78
|
8,283.27
|
Current Ratio
|
More than 2
|
0.78
|
1.74
|
Quick Assets
|
|
2,085.88
|
|
Quick Ratio
|
More Than 1
|
0.65
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
|
Total Outside Liabilities/ Tangible Net Worth (TOL/ TNW)
|
Below 3
|
1.24
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Term Liabilities/Tangible Net Worth (Long term Debt-Equity) Ratio
|
1
or less
|
0.78
|
0.60
|
1. The current and quick ratios of SCI are poor.
The liquidity ratios must have deteriorated with losses in the last few years
and it will take another two to three years for them to reach the acceptable
levels.
Highlights:
Highlights:
2. The TOL/ TNW and long-term debt-equity ratios
of SCI are well within the norms.
3. Great Eastern’s numbers on the other hand
are quite attractive.
Conclusion:
Based on Balance Sheet analysis
SCI is not justified to be included in a value-investing portfolio.
Only because the P2BV Ratio is very attractive and the company is
definitely on the recovery mode and the market conditions are likely to
improve, SCI may be considered.
Cash Flow Analysis:
|
SCI
(Year ending 31st March 2016)
|
Great Eastern
(Year
ending 31st March 2016)
|
(Rs. Crore/ Rs. 10 million)
|
|
|
Net
Cash Flows from Operating Activities as Reported
|
1424.99
|
2046.80
|
Less:
Interest
|
209.53
|
-295.28
|
Exchange Difference
|
-0.30
|
|
CSR & Staff Welfare
|
0.50
|
|
Balance
Cash From Operations/ Free Cash flows
|
1215.26
|
1751.52
|
Face
Value
|
10.00
|
10.00
|
Number
of Equity Shares
|
46.58
|
15.08
|
Free
Cash Flows / Share
|
26.09
|
116.16
|
Free
Cash Flows / Share as % of Market Price
|
40.54%
|
32.10%
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
Purchase
of Fixed Assets
|
-512.13
|
-675.08
|
Sale
of Fixed Assets
|
12.50
|
234.48
|
Others
|
184.18
|
105.13
|
Total
Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities
|
-315.45
|
-335.47
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
Loans
Raised/ (Repaid)
|
-867.65
|
-1025.04
|
Dividends
Paid
|
-0.07
|
-312.49
|
Dividend
Distribution Tax
|
|
-61.89
|
Total
|
-867.72
|
-1399.42
|
Highlights:
1. SCI is generating decent net operating cash flows of around
Rs.1,215 crores every year.
2. SCI did not distribute cash as dividends.
It is understandable as SCI is recovering from losses. On the other hand Great
Eastern has distributed a decent 18% of free
cash flows as dividends.
3. Both companies had bought new ships
during the year.
4. Both the companies have utilized major
portions of their free cash for paring down debt (SCI 71% and Great Eastern
59%), in order to save interest costs and improve profit margins.
Conclusion:
SCI has utilized free cash sensibly for adding new ships (perhaps more
to rebalance the fleet) and for reducing debt. Non-payment of dividends though
unforgivable is quite understandable as SCI is coming out of losses. Other than
dividend, SCI has managed cash properly.
Dividend Track Record
Announcement Date
|
Dividend Type
|
Dividend(%)
|
Remarks
|
31/05/2015
|
--
|
--
|
Missed
|
31/05/2014
|
--
|
--
|
Missed
|
31/05/2013
|
--
|
--
|
Missed
|
31/05/2012
|
--
|
--
|
Missed
|
31/05/2011
|
Final
|
25%
|
Rs.2.50 per share(25%)Final Dividend
|
20/01/2011
|
Interim
|
30%
|
|
31/05/2010
|
Final
|
50%
|
|
15/06/2009
|
Final
|
65%
|
|
11/06/2008
|
Final
|
40%
|
AGM
|
12/02/2008
|
Interim
|
45%
|
|
13/03/2007
|
Interim
|
85%
|
|
23/01/2006
|
Interim
|
85%
|
|
13/06/2005
|
Final
|
30%
|
AGM
|
14/10/2004
|
Interim
|
40%
|
|
10/09/2003
|
Interim
|
170%
|
|
18/02/2003
|
Interim
|
30%
|
|
15/03/2002
|
Interim
|
35%
|
(Revised)
|
17/07/2001
|
Final
|
5%
|
AGM
|
24/04/2001
|
Interim
|
25%
|
|
10/09/2000
|
Final
|
16%
|
|
06/10/1999
|
Final
|
15%
|
AGM & Dividend
|
03/10/1998
|
--
|
--
|
Missed
|
03/10/1997
|
Final
|
20%
|
03/10/1997
|
HighlighCompany’s
uninterrupted dividend paying track record is blotted and un-acceptable.
Conclusion:
Uninterrupted
payment track record is extremely poor.
Dividend Coverage from non-operating income
Since the company
has not paid dividends this parameter cannot be measured.
On
this parameter the company’s performance is not satisfactory.
B.Market
Condition:
Price to Earnings Ratio:
PE Ratio is 11.11,
is well below the recommended 15 but marginally above our threshold of 10.
The
market condition as far is this parameter is concerned is favorable.
Price to Book Value (P2BV) per Share:
Company has
negligible intangible assets and hence no need to calculate adjusted P2BV
Ratio. Therfore the price to book
ratio 0.44 is the real and only attraction in the share.
On
this parameter the market condition is highly favorable.
Dividend Yield:
Since no dividends
are paid in the last few years, the question of dividend yield does not arise.
On
this parameter the market condition is highly un-favorable.
Actually it is not the market condition but the company performance that is to
be blamed.
Distance from 52 week high:
The 52-week low
for this share is Rs.54.35. and the distance from the 52 week low is just 18.39%.
The
market condition as far is this parameter is concerned is favorable.
Five year Return:
The five-year
return (return measured by change in share price) is just -7.81%. Which means
that there is just a marginal advantage accruing out of market hammering of the
scrip in this front.
On
this parameter the market condition there is no special favorable market
condition.
D.
Investment Decision:
The final investment decision in Shipping
Corporation of India Ltd. is very difficult to make. Company’s performance is
mixed. Inconsistent profitability and lack of impeccable uninterrupted dividend
paying record, poor liquidity ratios are under normal circumstances
unpardonable and do not allow to be included in a value investor’s portfolio.
Extremely low P2BV Ratio of 0.44 and SCI
being an integrated and dominant shipping companies in India and the company is
making profits and generating decent free cash flows are the actors weighing in
its favor.
Future prospects are likely to favor as
shipping rates which are currently at historical lows improve on the back of
global economic recovery.
Final
Advice:
Buy.
Limit the amount to 5% of total stock portfolio. Buy with the knowledge that
SCI is not a usual candidate but a special situation investment decision based
on extremely low P2BV.